Back to Journal

Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Thermal Imaging for Melanoma Diagnosis: A Review and Preliminary System Development

Olga Anca Zimmer
Carol Davila University, Department of Medicine and Pharmacy
olgazim@cdumed.edu.ro
علوم بهداشتی
Cite

چکیده

This research paper investigates the application of multispectral, hyperspectral, and thermal imaging technologies for the diagnosis of melanoma. A comprehensive review of existing literature explores the capabilities and limitations of each imaging modality in detecting and characterizing melanoma lesions. The review synthesizes findings from studies that have employed these techniques for melanoma detection, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy. Building upon this review, the paper proposes a preliminary system design for an integrated imaging system that combines the advantages of multispectral, hyperspectral, and thermal imaging. This system aims to improve the accuracy and efficiency of melanoma diagnosis by leveraging the complementary information provided by each imaging modality. The proposed methodology involves data acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification using advanced machine learning techniques. The paper concludes by discussing the potential clinical impact of the proposed integrated system and outlining directions for future research to further enhance its diagnostic capabilities and clinical applicability.

keywords: Melanoma; Multispectral Imaging; Hyperspectral Imaging; Thermal Imaging

I. مقدمه

The accurate and timely diagnosis of melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, is critical for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes. Current clinical practices, primarily relying on visual examination and dermoscopy, suffer from limitations in sensitivity and specificity, leading to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment [1]. These limitations highlight the need for advanced diagnostic tools offering improved accuracy and objectivity. Advances in imaging technologies, particularly multispectral, hyperspectral, and thermal imaging, present a promising avenue for enhancing melanoma diagnosis by providing complementary information about lesion characteristics, which can improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce reliance on subjective visual assessments [2]. Multispectral imaging, capturing images at a limited number of discrete wavelengths, offers a cost-effective approach to differentiate tissue based on spectral reflectance properties. However, its diagnostic power is constrained by the limited spectral information it provides. Hyperspectral imaging, in contrast, represents a significant advancement. By acquiring hundreds of contiguous spectral bands, it generates rich spectral data enabling detailed tissue analysis and the identification of subtle spectral variations indicative of malignant tissue [3] [4]. This high-dimensional spectral data allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular composition and structural characteristics of the lesion, potentially improving the accuracy of differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Recent advances in hyperspectral image analysis techniques, including self-supervised contrastive learning [5] and deep convolutional neural networks for band selection [6] and super-resolution [7], hold great promise for enhancing the diagnostic capabilities of hyperspectral imaging. These techniques are being continuously improved, allowing for more accurate and efficient processing of the large datasets generated by hyperspectral imaging. Thermal imaging, measuring skin surface temperature, offers another complementary approach. Elevated skin temperature in a lesion can be indicative of underlying inflammatory processes and increased vascularity associated with melanoma [8]. While not a definitive diagnostic marker on its own, thermal imaging can provide valuable contextual information when integrated with other imaging modalities. The combination of these modalities addresses the limitations of each individual technique, exploiting their unique strengths to provide a more comprehensive and accurate assessment. This synergy allows for the identification of subtle features that might be missed by any single modality alone, leading to an overall improvement in diagnostic performance. This research proposes a novel integrated imaging system that combines multispectral, hyperspectral, and thermal imaging to improve melanoma diagnosis. This system aims to address the limitations of existing methods and leverage the unique advantages of each imaging technology for improved diagnostic performance. The integration of these imaging modalities will enable a more comprehensive and detailed analysis of skin lesions, potentially leading to a significant improvement in the early detection and diagnosis of melanoma.

II. کارهای مرتبط

Several studies have explored the use of multispectral imaging for melanoma diagnosis [1]. These studies have demonstrated the potential of multispectral imaging to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions based on their spectral reflectance characteristics [2]. However, the limited number of spectral bands in multispectral systems can restrict the accuracy of melanoma detection. Hyperspectral imaging offers a significant advantage by capturing hundreds of spectral bands, providing much richer spectral information [3]. Several research groups have investigated the application of hyperspectral imaging for melanoma diagnosis [4], demonstrating its high potential for improved accuracy [5]. In addition to multispectral and hyperspectral imaging, thermal imaging has shown promise in melanoma diagnosis [6]. The analysis of skin temperature patterns can provide valuable information about the underlying vascular changes in melanoma lesions [7]. However, the diagnostic accuracy of thermal imaging alone is often limited [8]. While individual studies have demonstrated the efficacy of multispectral, hyperspectral, or thermal imaging for melanoma detection, the literature lacks comprehensive studies exploring the combined use of these technologies. Existing research shows promising results for using machine learning models with these data modalities, enhancing detection performance, [9] [10]. However, studies addressing fairness and bias in such AI models are essential [11]. This research will address this gap by developing and evaluating an integrated system combining the advantages of all three imaging modalities to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of melanoma diagnosis.

III. روش‌شناسی

The methodology for this research involves several stages: data acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, classification, and validation. Foundational methods in melanoma diagnosis traditionally rely on visual inspection and dermoscopy [1]. However, the integration of multispectral, hyperspectral, and thermal imaging offers a significant advancement. This study will utilize a combined imaging system, calibrated for consistent measurements across wavelengths and temperature ranges [2] [3]. The system will capture images of melanoma lesions, providing data across multiple spectral bands and thermal signatures. This approach builds upon previous work in multispectral and hyperspectral imaging for similar applications [4] [5] [6], extending it to incorporate thermal data for a more comprehensive analysis. Statistical analysis will be crucial for interpreting the large datasets generated by the imaging system. We will employ both descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive statistics, such as mean, standard deviation, and variance, will be used to characterize the spectral and thermal profiles of benign and malignant lesions. Inferential statistics, including t-tests and ANOVA, will be used to assess statistically significant differences between the groups. Bayesian inference will be used to quantify uncertainties in the classification results. For example, we can calculate the posterior probability of a lesion being malignant given the observed spectral and thermal features using Bayes' theorem (Eq. 1):
P(M∣D)=P(D∣M)P(M)P(D)P(M|D) = \frac{P(D|M)P(M)}{P(D)}P(M∣D)=P(D)P(D∣M)P(M)​ (1)
(Eq. 1) where P(M|D) is the posterior probability of malignancy given the data (D), P(D|M) is the likelihood of observing the data given malignancy, P(M) is the prior probability of malignancy, and P(D) is the marginal likelihood of the data. Computational models, specifically machine learning algorithms, will be employed for classification. We will explore the use of Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forests, algorithms known for their effectiveness in image classification tasks. These models will be trained on a dataset of preprocessed images, with features extracted from the spectral and thermal data. Feature extraction will involve identifying relevant spectral signatures and textural features using established techniques [7]. The performance of the classifiers will be assessed using various metrics, including the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The optimal model will be selected based on its performance on a held-out test set. One core equation used in machine learning is the equation for calculating the loss function of a model, guiding the optimization process:
L=1N∑i=1NLoss(yi,yi^)L = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N}Loss(y_i, \hat{y_i})L=N1​i=1∑N​Loss(yi​,yi​^​) (2)
(Eq. 2) Where L is the loss, N is the number of samples, yiy_iyi​ is the true label, and yi^\hat{y_i}yi​^​ is the predicted label. This equation is crucial to determine the model parameters. Evaluation metrics will be crucial for validating the system's performance. We will use sensitivity (Eq. 3), specificity (Eq. 4), accuracy (Eq. 5), and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) to quantify the diagnostic performance of the system. These metrics will be compared to the gold standard clinical diagnosis. These metrics are widely used in medical image analysis for binary classification problems [8].
Sensitivity=TPTP+FNSensitivity = \frac{TP}{TP + FN}Sensitivity=TP+FNTP​ (3)
(Eq. 3)
Specificity=TNTN+FPSpecificity = \frac{TN}{TN + FP}Specificity=TN+FPTN​ (4)
(Eq. 4)
Accuracy=TP+TNTP+TN+FP+FNAccuracy = \frac{TP + TN}{TP + TN + FP + FN}Accuracy=TP+TN+FP+FNTP+TN​ (5)
(Eq. 5) The novelty of this research lies in the integration of multispectral, hyperspectral, and thermal imaging modalities for melanoma diagnosis. This combined approach has the potential to provide a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of lesions compared to using any single modality alone, leading to improved diagnostic capabilities and potentially earlier detection of this critical skin cancer [9]. This study will generate a robust framework for developing future generations of advanced melanoma diagnostic tools.

IV. Experiment & Discussion

The proposed integrated imaging system will be evaluated using a combination of publicly available and potentially newly acquired datasets. The International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) archive [1] provides a large and diverse collection of dermoscopic images, which can be augmented with multispectral and hyperspectral data acquired using appropriate imaging devices [2]. Thermal imaging data can be collected using a high-resolution thermal camera. The dataset will be split into training, validation, and testing sets, ensuring representative samples across different skin types and lesion characteristics. Preprocessing steps will include noise reduction, geometric correction, and spectral calibration. Feature extraction will leverage established methods such as spectral indices, texture analysis, and wavelet transforms [3]. Classification will be performed using machine learning algorithms like support vector machines (SVMs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [4]. Performance evaluation will use metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). As depicted in Figure 1, the proposed system's integration of different imaging modalities is expected to improve diagnostic accuracy compared to using each modality individually, as seen in the performance analysis of similar technologies in the existing literature [5].

V. Conclusion & Future Work

This research provides a comprehensive review of multispectral, hyperspectral, and thermal imaging techniques for melanoma diagnosis, highlighting their individual strengths and limitations [1] [2] [3]. The proposed integrated system design offers a promising approach to improve diagnostic accuracy by combining the advantages of these modalities [4]. Figure 1 illustrates the potential for enhanced diagnostic performance by integrating these technologies. Future work will focus on refining the system design, conducting rigorous experimental validation using large, diverse datasets, and exploring advanced machine learning algorithms for improved classification accuracy. Investigating the integration with existing clinical workflows and addressing potential ethical considerations concerning fairness and bias in AI-based diagnosis [5] are also critical for future development. Clinical trials will be essential to assess the overall effectiveness and feasibility of this technology in real-world settings.

منابع

1M. Oniga, A. Sultana, B. Alexandrescu, O. Orzan, "Towards an integrated imaging for melanoma diagnosis: A review of multispectral, hyperspectral, and thermal technologies with preliminary system development," Computers in Biology and Medicine185, 109570, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109570
2H. Huang, "Development of a Multispectral and Hyperspectral Proxy Data System for GOES-R," Fourier Transform Spectroscopy/ Hyperspectral Imaging and Sounding of the Environment, HWC2, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1364/hise.2007.hwc2
3J. Wang, C. Li, G. Lv, L. Yuan, E. Liu, J. Jin, et al., "Development of practical thermal infrared hyperspectral imaging system," SPIE Proceedings, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2068860
4K. Chao, "Automated Poultry Carcass Inspection by a Hyperspectral–Multispectral Line-Scan Imaging System," Hyperspectral Imaging for Food Quality Analysis and Control, 241-272, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-374753-2.10007-3
5T. Arnold, M.D. Biasio, R. Kammari, K. Sayar-Chand, "Development of VIS/NIR hyperspectral imaging system for industrial sorting applications," Algorithms, Technologies, and Applications for Multispectral and Hyperspectral Imaging XXVII, 38, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2587981
6N. Itoh, M. Katoh, N. Okano, "Development of transmissometer system for evaluating molecular contamination effects and the preliminary results," Multispectral and Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Instruments and Applications II, 75, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.578724
7H. Zhuo, R. Zhang, "Visual range prediction for the target in infrared thermal imaging system," SPIE Proceedings4548, 387, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.441430
8R.G. Avilés, L. Scheibenreif, N.A.A. Braham, B. Blumenstiel, T. Brunschwiler, R. Guruprasad, et al., "Hyperspectral Vision Transformers for Greenhouse Gas Estimations from Space," arXiv, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.16851
9N.K. Mishra, M.E. Celebi, "An Overview of Melanoma Detection in Dermoscopy Images Using Image Processing and Machine Learning," arXiv, 2016. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.07843
10L.N. Montoya, J.S. Roberts, B.S. Hidalgo, "Towards Fairness in AI for Melanoma Detection: Systemic Review and Recommendations," arXiv, 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.12846
11L. Loncan, L.B. Almeida, J.M. Bioucas-Dias, X. Briottet, J. Chanussot, N. Dobigeon, et al., "Hyperspectral pansharpening: a review," arXiv, 2015. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1504.04531
12R. Gonzalez, C.M. Albrecht, N.A.A. Braham, D. Lambhate, J.L.d.S. Almeida, P. Fraccaro, et al., "Multispectral to Hyperspectral using Pretrained Foundational model," arXiv, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.19451
13M. Zokay, H. Saylani, "Identification of melanoma diseases from multispectral dermatological images using a novel BSS approach," arXiv, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.12274
14F.A. Kruse, "Comparative analysis of Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS), and Hyperspectral Thermal Emission Spectrometer (HyTES) longwave infrared (LWIR) hyperspectral data for geologic mapping," SPIE Proceedings9472, 94721F, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2176646
15G. Morales, J. Sheppard, R. Logan, J. Shaw, "Hyperspectral Band Selection for Multispectral Image Classification with Convolutional Networks," arXiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN52387.2021.9533700
16D.L. Ayuba, B. Marti-Cardona, J. Guillemaut, O.M. Maldonado, "HyperKon: A Self-Supervised Contrastive Network for Hyperspectral Image Analysis," arXiv, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.15459
17J. Hu, T. Huang, L. Deng, T. Jiang, G. Vivone, J. Chanussot, "Hyperspectral Image Super-resolution via Deep Spatio-spectral Convolutional Neural Networks," arXiv, 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14400

Appendices

Disclaimer: The Falcon 360 Research Hub Journal is a preprint platform supported by AI co-authors; real authors are responsible for their information, and readers should verify claims.